You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ganzfeld Blankout Occurs in Bowl Perimetry and Is Eliminated by Translucent Occlusion

Patti S. Fuhr, OD; Todd A. Hershner, OD; Kent M. Daum, OD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(7):983-988.


Abstract

• An intermittent darkening of the visual field (ganzfeld "blankout") is perceived during bowl perimetry. Since this may be a form of rivalry, we hypothesized that occluding the nontested eye with a translucent occluder may eliminate the phenomenon. Ten normal subjects underwent visual field testing with both a translucent and an opaque occluder. Eight of the 10 reported darkening to occur with the opaque patch, while none reported it with the translucent occluder. The darkening occurred with a mean latency of 10.9 seconds, occupied 34.4% of the time, and on average occurred 3.25 times per minute. With the translucent occluder, retest threshold variability was 18.8% less and sensitivity was increased by 0.7 dB. The elimination of this darkening using translucent occluders in bowl perimetry will allow reduced variability and increased sensitivity and comfort.



Author Affiliations

From the School of Optometry/The Medical Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 13, 1990.

Reprint requests to The University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Optometry/The Medical Center, UAB Station, Birmingham, AL 35294 (Dr Fuhr).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantifying Adaptation and Fatigue Effects in Frequency Doubling Perimetry
Anderson and McKendrick
IOVS 2007;48:943-948.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Altered visual sensitivity in axial high myopia: a local postreceptoral phenomenon?
Jaworski et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3695-3702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2.
Barkana et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:781-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of the Normative Database for the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter
Anderson et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1540-1548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.