You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 5, May 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Effects of repeated photic exposures on the monkey macula

J. Borges, Z. Y. Li and M. O. Tso
Department of Ophthalmology, H.S. Joao/Oporto Medical School, Porto, Portugal.

The posterior pole of the eyes of rhesus monkeys was exposed to the light of an indirect ophthalmoscope. The tissue changes caused by repeated (three to five) photic injuries were compared with those produced by a single photic insult. The ophthalmoscopic and angiographic examinations showed a progressive involvement of the foveal area after multiple exposures to light. Histopathologic study showed that after one exposure the retinal pigment epithelium appeared focally atrophic. Plaques of proliferated retinal pigment epithelium could also be seen, and on the anterior surface of these plaques a layer of relatively cuboidal hypopigmented retinal pigment epithelial cells was present. With multiple exposures, focal areas of total absence of retinal pigment epithelium were seen in these eyes. The eyes that received only one exposure showed partially regenerated photoreceptor outer segments. After repeated photic exposures, the photoreceptor outer segments failed to regenerate even 6 to 8 months after the last exposure. In one eye exposed five times for 60 minutes, areas of total absence of photoreceptor cells could be seen, and the inner nuclear layer was directly apposed to Bruch's membrane. These experimental exposures to the light of an indirect ophthalmoscope were 60 to 120 minutes long and were not comparable to clinical exposures of the ophthalmoscope in patient examination. Our observation highlighted the cumulative effects of repeated light injury to the retinal pigment epithelial and photoreceptor cells and also showed the similarity between this animal model of photic maculopathy and the changes present in the eyes of human patients with atrophic agerlated macular degeneration.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intraocular Lenses Should Block UV Radiation and Violet but Not Blue Light
Mainster
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:550-555.
FULL TEXT  

Sunlight and the 10-Year Incidence of Age-Related Maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Tomany et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:750-757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How much blue light should an IOL transmit?
Mainster and Sparrow
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1523-1529.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Involvement of Oxidative Mechanisms in Blue-Light-Induced Damage to A2E-Laden RPE
Sparrow et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1222-1227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Body of Evidence to Support a Protective Role for Lutein and Zeaxanthin in Delaying Chronic Disease. Overview
Mares-Perlman et al.
J. Nutr. 2002;132:518S-524.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunlight and the 5-Year Incidence of Early Age-Related Maculopathy: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Cruickshanks et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:246-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.