 |
 |

A Comparison of Wound Healing in Sutured and Unsutured Corneal Wounds
Gerrit R. J. Melles, MD;
Perry S. Binder, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(10):1460-1469.
Abstract
We compared corneal wound healing in 25 clear transplants with 26 keratotomy specimens and sutured and unsutured corneal wounds in a monkey model. Monkey wounds healed faster than human wounds, but healing time within the same species varied. Sutured wounds were characterized by subepithelial fibroplasia, recovery of collagen fiber continuity and absence of epithelial plugs. Unsutured wounds had no subepithelial fibroplasia but had fibroblasts and collagen fiber orientation parallel to wounds. Unsutured wounds in corneas containing sutures had subepithelial fibroplasia, and fibroblast orientation and fiber deposition parallel to the wound. Epithelial ingrowth and incarceration of Bowman's layer and/or Descemet's membrane in unsutured wounds appeared to disrupt wound healing. Abnormalities in wound healing in sutured or unsutured wounds are associated with lamellar distortion, a modified inflammatory response, and individual wound healing responses.
Author Affiliations
From the Ophthalmology Research Laboratory, Sharp Cabrillo Hospital, San Diego, Calif (Dr Binder), and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Leyden, the Netherlands (Dr Melles).
Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 31, 1990.
Reprint requests to Ophthalmology Research Laboratory, Sharp Cabrillo Hospital, 3475 Kenyon St, San Diego, CA 92110 (Dr Binder).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective analysis
Jeganathan et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:893-895.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Epithelial-Stromal Interactions in Human Keratotomy Wound Healing
Melles et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1124-1130.
ABSTRACT
Variation in Healing Throughout the Depth of Long-term, Unsutured, Corneal Wounds in Human Autopsy Specimens and Monkeys
Melles et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:100-109.
ABSTRACT
|