This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Anders Heijl, MD; Georg Lindgren, PhD; Jonny Olsson, MS

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(1):81-86.

Abstract
• Two groups of normal subjects were submitted to repeated automated static threshold perimetry. Perimetric results were strongly affected by the level of experience in some subjects; in the majority, however, the effect of experience was small. Initial field tests often showed high numbers of depressed points. Sensitivity increased with perimetric training, particularly between the first sessions. Those subjects who improved most started low, gradually approaching normal levels with experience. Learning effects were more pronounced peripherally than paracentrally and "untrained" fields characteristically showed concentric contraction with numerous points with low sensitivity peripherally. An important practical conclusion is to allow repeated testing of all inexperienced patients in whom initial fields do not agree with clinical findings. A chart showing a concentrically narrowed field should be viewed with particular suspicion. Furthermore, a single initial field may constitute an inadequate baseline for clinical follow-up.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Ophthalmology in Malmö (Sweden), University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital (Dr Heijl), and the Department of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund (Dr Lindgren and Mr Olsson).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 12, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology in Malmö, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, S-21401 Malmö, Sweden (Dr Heijl).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry Using the Nidek MP1 in Patients with Macular Disease
Chen et al.
IOVS 2009;50:3464-3472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rarebit Perimetry in Normal Subjects: Test Retest Variability, Learning Effect, Normative Range, Influence of Optical Defocus, and Cataract Extraction
Salvetat et al.
IOVS 2007;48:5320-5331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Intraocular Pressure Reduction on Perimetric Variability in Glaucomatous Eyes
Fogagnolo et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4557-4563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry
Burgansky-Eliash et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:933-938.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Input Data on the Performance of a Neural Network in Distinguishing Normal and Glaucomatous Visual Fields
Bengtsson et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3730-3736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Attention on Conventional Automated Perimetry and Luminance Size Threshold Perimetry
Wall et al.
IOVS 2004;45:342-350.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multisampling Suprathreshold Perimetry: A Comparison with Conventional Suprathreshold and Full-Threshold Strategies by Computer Simulation
Artes et al.
IOVS 2003;44:2582-2587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation of a scanning laser derived oedema index and visual function following grid laser treatment for diabetic macular oedema
Hudson et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:455-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Pupil Perimetry and Visual Perimetry in Normal Eyes: Decibel Sensitivity and Variability
Hong et al.
IOVS 2001;42:957-965.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SITA Standard in Optic Neuropathies and Hemianopias: A Comparison with Full Threshold Testing
Wall et al.
IOVS 2001;42:528-537.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Long-Term Fluctuation of the Visual Field in Stable Glaucoma
Hutchings et al.
IOVS 2000;41:3429-3436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Objective morphological assessment of macular hole surgery by scanning laser tomography
Hudson et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:107-116.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Perimetric Experience in Patients With Glaucoma
Heijl and Bengtsson
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:19-22.
ABSTRACT  

Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression for Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy With Normal Intraocular Pressure
Wax et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1219-1228.
ABSTRACT  

Glaucoma Hemifield Test: Automated Visual Field Evaluation
Asman and Heijl
Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:812-819.
ABSTRACT  

Ganzfeld Blankout Occurs in Bowl Perimetry and Is Eliminated by Translucent Occlusion
Fuhr et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:983-988.
ABSTRACT