You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Tono-Pen

A Manometric and Clinical Study

William A. Boothe, MD; David A. Lee, MD; William C. Panek, MD; Thomas H. Pettit, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(9):1214-1217.


Abstract



• A new miniaturized, digital, electronic tonometer, the Tono-Pen (Intermedics, Pasadena, Calif), was evaluated for accuracy and reproducibility of results in the laboratory using enucleated human eyes with an indwelling pressure transducer (manometric study) and clinically using 100 eyes in 50 patients with normal corneas. Reproducibility was good in both the manometric study (SD = 1.09) and in the clinical study (SD = 1.21). Reproducibility of results was similar to that of the MacKay-Marg tonometer and the pneumotonometer in the manometric study, but less than that of the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the pneumotonometer in the clinical study. In the manometric study, the Tono-Pen had less mean error at high pressure ranges than either the MacKay-Marg tonometer or the pneumotonometer. In the clinical study, no statistically significant difference was found between the Tono-Pen and the applanation tonometer at pressures of 10 to 35 mm Hg (the extent of the data spread). In addition to being reliable and accurate, this miniaturized tonometer is portable and easy to use.



Author Affiliations



From the Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Medical Center. Dr Boothe is a Samuel Goldwyn Fellow and Dr Panek is an Abe Meyer Fellow.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 12, 1988.

Reprint requests to Jules Stein Eye Institute, 800 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Lee).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Corneal Modulus and IOP Measurements in Canine Eyes Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Tono-pen
Tang et al.
IOVS 2011;52:7866-7871.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Early Neuron Degeneration and Accompanying Microglial Responses in the Retina of a Rat Model of Glaucoma
Naskar et al.
IOVS 2002;43:2962-2968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measurements with the Pneumotonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, and Tono-Pen
Bhan et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1389-1392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of remifentanil compared with fentanyl on intraocular pressure after succinylcholine and tracheal intubation{dagger}
Ng et al.
Br J Anaesth 2000;85:785-787.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia
Wright and Grajewski
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:448-451.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Peribulbar and Retrobulbar Anesthesia for Vitreoretinal Surgical Procedures
Demediuk et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:908-913.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of Oculab Tono-Pen Readings Obtained From Various Corneal and Scleral Locations
Khan et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1444-1446.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment of Intraocular Pressure in Vitrectomized Gas-Containing Eyes: A Clinical and Manometric Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Pneumotonometer
Lim et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:684-688.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.