You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LABORATORY SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diamond Burring and Surgical Keratectomy

Morphologic Comparison in the Rabbit

Scot E. Lance, MD; Antonio Capone, Jr, MD; Nirmala SundarRaj, PhD; Melvin I. Roat, MD; Richard A. Thoft, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):830-834.


Abstract

• We compared the effects of diamond burring keratectomy (DBK) and surgical superficial lamellar keratectomy (SLK) on the rabbit corneal epithelial healing rate and corneal morphology 1, 4, 7, and 14 days after wounding. Epithelial defects healed significantly more slowly following 10-mm-diameter SLK than following DBK. Restoration of normal epithelial morphology occurred within two weeks in the DBK corneas. During the same interval, SLK corneas showed poor transition of basal to superficial cell morphology. Four days after surgery, the DBK corneas all exhibited marked keratocyte depletion in the anterior stroma but fibrocytes uniformly repopulated this area by 14 days after wounding. Conversely, the SLK corneas all had a hypercellular band of fibrocytes in the anterior stroma by four days following surgery and continued to increase in cellularity through 14 days after wounding. These data indicate that DBK is the preferred procedure for creation of a recipient bed for epithelial lenticles in keratoepithelioplasty and conjunctival transplantation.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, The Eye and Ear Institute, the University of Pittsburgh.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 7, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, The Eye and Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (Dr Thoft).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Complications of Automated Lamellar Keratectomy
Crews et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1514-1515.
ABSTRACT  

Indications for Keratoepithelioplasty
Turgeon et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:233-236.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.