You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 6, June 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer

R. E. Frenkel, Y. J. Hong and D. H. Shin
Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201.

Oculab Tono-Pen tonometry was compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry in 142 eyes of 71 patients without corneal problems. Overall we found 63% of the Tono-Pen readings to be within +/- 2 mm Hg of the Goldmann applanation tonometry readings and 77% to be within +/- 3 mm Hg, while 4% were within at least +/- 7 mm Hg difference. The correlation coefficient between the readings of the two instruments was .84. The mean value of the paired differences was 0.81 +/- 3.09 mm Hg overall, -1.78 +/- 1.86 mm Hg in the 4 to 10 mm Hg interval, 0.07 +/- 2.97 mm Hg in the 11 to 20 mm Hg interval, 1.27 +/- 2.62 mm Hg in the 21 to 30 mm Hg interval, and 4.15 +/- 2.28 mm Hg in the 31 to 45 mm Hg interval. We conclude that the Tono-Pen measures intraocular pressure in a manner that corresponds well to the Goldmann tonometer in the 11 to 20 mm Hg interval, and fairly well in the 4 to 10 mm Hg and 21 to 30 mm Hg intervals. It lacks good correspondence in the 31 to 45 mm Hg interval.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reproducibility and Clinical Evaluation of Rebound Tonometry
Martinez-de-la-Casa et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4578-4580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability
Tonnu et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:847-850.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pressure Phosphene Self-Tonometry: A Comparison with Goldmann Tonometry in Glaucoma Patients
Lam et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3131-3136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dynamic Contour Tonometry: A Comparative Study on Human Cadaver Eyes
Kniestedt et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1287-1293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Comparison of the Proview Eye Pressure Monitor With the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and the TonoPen
Li et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1117-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Measurements with the Pneumotonometer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, and Tono-Pen
Bhan et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1389-1392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tono-Pen determination of intraocular pressure in patients with band keratopathy or glued cornea
Azuara-Blanco et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998;82:634-636.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia
Wright and Grajewski
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:448-451.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.