You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry

E. B. Werner, K. I. Bishop, J. Koelle, G. R. Douglas, R. P. LeBlanc, R. P. Mills, B. Schwartz, W. R. Whalen and J. T. Wilensky
Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

The visual fields of 30 patients (subjects) with glaucoma were sent to six experienced clinicians (observers). Each subject had at least four visual field examinations on the OCTOPUS 201 automated perimeter spanning at least one year. Each observer was asked to review the visual field data of each subject and determine whether the visual fields were stable, improved, or worse over time. The visual field data were then analyzed using six different statistical models. In only 15 of the 30 subjects did at least five of the six human observers agree on the behavior of the visual field. Agreement among the statistical models was better, with at least five of the six models agreeing on 22 of the 30 subjects. It was concluded that there is, at present, no validated technique for detecting progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry when relatively few visual fields are available for analysis.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pointwise Linear Regression Analysis for Detection of Visual Field Progression with Absolute versus Corrected Threshold Sensitivities.
Manassakorn et al.
IOVS 2006;47:2896-2903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pointwise Linear Regression for Evaluation of Visual Field Outcomes and Comparison With the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Methods
Nouri-Mahdavi et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:193-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Approach for Identifying Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Progression by Scanning Laser Tomography
Tan and Hitchings
IOVS 2003;44:2621-2626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods
Viswanathan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:726-730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Examination of Different Pointwise Linear Regression Methods for Determining Visual Field Progression
Gardiner and Crabb
IOVS 2002;43:1400-1407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fellow Eye Prognosis in Patients With Severe Visual Field Loss in 1 Eye From Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma
Chen and Bhandari
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:473-478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Severity and Stability of Glaucoma: Patient Perception Compared With Objective Measurement
Viswanathan et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:450-454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2
Viswanathan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:1037-1042.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.