You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Long-term Evaluation of 0.25% Levobunolol and Timolol for Therapy for Elevated Intraocular Pressure

Fay W. Boozman III, MD; Richard Carriker, MD; Robert Foerster, MD; Robert C. Allen, MD; Gary D. Novack, PhD; Amy L. Batoosingh

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(5):614-618.


Abstract

• In a one-year, double-masked, randomized study, the ocular hypotensive efficacy of twice-daily treatment with 0.25% levobunolol hydrochloride or timolol maleate was evaluated in 78 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (phase 1). If intraocular pressure (IOP) was not well controlled during the study, the concentration of medication was increased to 0.5%, and the patient was followed up for an additional three months (phase 2). During phase 1, the mean IOP was reduced by 4.6 mm Hg in the timolol treatment group and by 5.1 mm Hg in the levobunolol treatment group. Seventy-one percent (29/41) of the patients in the timolol treatment group and 70% (26/37) of the patients in the levobunolol treatment group successfully completed phase 1. Of those patients who required the higher concentration of medication, 89% (8/11) in the timolol treatment group and 75% (3/4) in the levobunolol treatment group successfully completed phase 2. Higher concentration, however, did not produce greater IOP reduction. No statistically or clinically significant differences between the groups were noted in any of the efficacy or safety variables evaluated.



Author Affiliations

From the University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Dr Allen); and the University of California (Dr Novack) and the Department of Ophthalmology Clinical Research, Allergan Inc (Dr Novack and Ms Batoosingh), Irvine, Calif. Drs Boozman, Carriker, and Foerster are in private practice in Rogers, Ark, Phoenix, and Colorado Springs, Colo, respectively.; Dr Novack and Ms Batoosingh are employed by Allergan Inc, Irvine, Calif, but have no proprietary interest in levobunolol.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 27, 1987.

Preliminary report of this work presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, Fla, May 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology Clinical Research, Allergan Inc, 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA 92715 (Dr Novack).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Randomized Clinical Trials on Medical Treatment of Glaucoma: Are They Appropriate to Guide Clinical Practice?
Rossetti et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:96-103.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.