You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 3, March 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: electroretinographic findings

M. A. Johnson, S. Marcus, M. J. Elman and T. J. McPhee
Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) were measured in 15 patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Seven of the patients had neovascularization of the iris (NVI) at the time of testing, and two developed NVI within one month of testing; six did not have NVI or any other form of neovascularization (NV) and were no longer considered to be at risk for NV from their present occlusion. The ERGs were recorded as a function of the stimulus intensity and to a 30-Hz flickering stimulus. A Naka-Rushton-type function was fit to b-wave amplitudes, measured as a function of stimulus intensity, to evaluate changes in ERG amplitude and sensitivity. Compared with eyes in the no-NV group, eyes developing NVI had significantly reduced ERG sensitivity and amplitudes. The distributions of sensitivity values in these two groups did not overlap. All of the eyes with NV showed large a- and b-wave and 30-Hz implicit time delays, but only one eye had a b/a-wave amplitude ratio close to or less than 1. A comparison of ERG sensitivity, amplitude data, and flicker timing data with retinal fluorescein angiography in a two-alternative forced-choice analysis showed that ERG sensitivity and amplitude loss were better than retinal fluorescein angiography at discriminating eyes with CRVO and NVI from eyes with CRVO without NVI.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multifocal Electroretinographic Features of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Dolan et al.
IOVS 2003;44:4954-4959.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Altered Retinal Function and Structure after Chronic Placental Insufficiency
Bui et al.
IOVS 2002;43:805-812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photopic 30 Hz flicker ERG as a predictor for rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion
Larsson and Andreasson
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:683-685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Central retinal vein occlusion: what's the story?
WILLIAMSON
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:698-704.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.