You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 2, February 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Surgical results in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

M. Kidd, J. Hetherington and S. Magee
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

The charts of 83 patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two eyes of 42 patients had had filtering surgery, 37 of whom had had a trabeculectomy to reduce uncontrolled intraocular pressure. Twenty-four of these trabeculectomy patients required a second surgery, and 8 required a third surgery. The results are presented using a survival analysis. The success rates at one year of follow-up for the first, second, and third trabeculectomies were 64%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Patients subclassified as having Chandler's syndrome, essential iris atrophy, and Cogan-Reese syndrome responded with approximately the same success rates within the first two years following their first surgery. The success rates for repeated surgeries are comparable with those of initial surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. On the basis of this study, further surgery is recommended despite initial failure in this group of difficult patients.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ultrasound biomicroscopy of Chinese eyes with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome
Zhang et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:64-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome in Thai Patients: Clinical Variations
Teekhasaenee and Ritch
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:187-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.