You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 9, September 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL ARTICLE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An Update on the Accreditation of Graduate Education in Ophthalmology

The Residency Review Committee for Ophthalmology

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(9):1189-1194.


Abstract

• Educational standards for residency training in ophthalmology are established by a nine-member committee whose members represent the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the American Medical Association, and the American Board of Ophthalmology. Residency programs are reviewed to see that they meet these standards and are accredited if they do. Over the past 11 years, the accreditation status of a total of 445 programs was reviewed: 19 programs lost accreditation (nine withdrew voluntarily), 52 programs were placed on probation or were continued on probation, 310 programs were granted full accreditation or continued accreditation, and 15 of 20 applicants were granted provisional accreditation. During this time, the Residency Review Committee for Ophthalmology on two occasions modified the "Special Requirements for Residency Training in Ophthalmology." In addition, an appeals process was instituted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to give program directors the opportunity to appeal adverse accreditation decisions. There is evidence that this system has had an overall beneficial effect on residency training in ophthalmology in the United States.



Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 11, 1987.

A complete listing of the authors appears at the end of this article.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown, WV 26506 (Dr Weinstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Residency Review Committee for Ophthalmology
Lessell
Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1002-1004.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.