You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 8, August 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intraocular Lens Power Calculations

A Practical Evaluation in Normal Subjects at The Wilmer Institute

Kuldev Singh, MD; Alfred Sommer, MD; Allen D. Jensen, MD; John W. Payne, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(8):1046-1050.


Abstract

• The practical value of preoperative intraocular lens power calculations in "normal" eyes with less than 4.50 diopters (D) of myopia or hyperopia was evaluated in a consecutive series of 520 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and lens implantation by four experienced surgeons at The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute. The observed postoperative results with the lenses selected by the surgeons were compared with results calculated for the measurement-predicted emmetropic power lens and for a standard 20-D lens. The need for postoperative spectacle correction of residual refractive errors was comparable for all three choices of lens. Only two eyes (0.4%) would have developed greater than 4.00 D of refractive error with either the "implanted" or "predicted-emmetropic" lenses, as would 11 eyes (2.1%) with the "standard" 20-D lens. The surgeons' deviation from the calculated emmetropic lens did not reduce postoperative refractive error.



Author Affiliations

From the Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology of The Wilmer Institute, and the School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Dr Singh is an Eleanor Naylor Dana Charitable Trust Fellow in Preventive Ophthalmology.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 4, 1987.

Reprint requests to Wilmer 120, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Sommer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Extracapsular Cataract Extraction in Nepal: 2-Year Outcome
Ruit et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1761-1763.
ABSTRACT  

Cataract Surgery: A Global Perspective
Taylor and Sommer
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:797-798.
ABSTRACT  

Intraocular Lens Power
Chapin
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:13-13.
ABSTRACT  

Ocular Biometry
Schechter
Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1626-1627.
ABSTRACT  

Intraocular Lens Power Calculations: An Extra Edge or Expensive Waste?
Olson
Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1035-1036.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.