You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of complement activation by silicone intraocular lenses and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses with polypropylene loops

B. J. Mondino, G. M. Rajacich and H. Sumner

Silicone intraocular lenses are undergoing clinical investigation for use in the United States. We compared the ability of silicone intraocular lenses to activate the complement system in human sera with that of polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses with polypropylene loops using a radioimmunoassay that measures levels of activated complement fragments. Sera incubated with polymethylmethacrylate lenses with polypropylene loops had higher levels of C3a and C5a, but not C4a, than control sera incubated without intraocular lenses. On the other hand, there were no differences in levels of C3a, C4a, and C5a between sera incubated with silicone lenses and control sera. These results suggest that polymethylmethacrylate lenses with polypropylene loops activate the alternative pathway of complement, while silicone lenses do not.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.