You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 11, November 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Afferent Pupillary Defect in Asymmetric Glaucoma

Reay H. Brown, MD; John D. Zilis, MD; Mary G. Lynch, MD; George E. Sanborn, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(11):1540-1543.


Abstract



• The OCTOPUS 2000 perimeter and a central 30° program were used to study consecutively 27 patients with glaucoma who had either a relative afferent pupillary defect (APD) or asymmetric optic nerve cupping without an APD. The mean difference in visual field sensitivity between fellow eyes was 48.2% (range, 13% to 93%) for the APD group and 5.5% (range, 0% to 9.0%) for the non-APD group. The mean difference in cup-disc ratio was 0.43 (range, 0.2 to 0.6) for the APD group and 0.24 (range, 0.2 to 0.3) for the non-APD group. The APD depth was quantitated with neutral density filters and correlated with visual field asymmetry but not with cup-disc ratio asymmetry. There was no overlap between the APD and non-APD groups in the amount of visual field asymmetry: Every patient with a sensitivity difference of 13% or greater had an APD. The presence of an APD indicates that a threshold of asymmetric optic nerve damage has been exceeded. With automated perimetry, this threshold can be quantitated and may improve the assessment of patients with glaucoma.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication July 16, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-9057 (Dr Brown).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Associating the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) with visual field indices in glaucoma patients
Schiefer et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2012;0:bjophthalmol-2011-300776v-bjophthalmol-2011-300776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The utility of relative afferent pupillary defect as a screening tool for glaucoma: prospective examination of a large population-based study in a south Indian population
Hennessy et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1203-1206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma Patients with a Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect
Chew et al.
IOVS 2010;51:5049-5053.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma
Tatsumi et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:633-637.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Afferent Pupillary Defect in Asymmetric Glaucoma
Burde
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:721-721.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.