You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 5, May 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Direct-Smear Fluorescent Antibody Cytology as a Field Diagnostic Tool for Trachoma

Martha C. Wilson; Francisco Millan-Velasco, MD; James M. Tielsch, PhD; Hugh R. Taylor, MD, FRACS

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(5):688-690.


Abstract

• A recently developed direct-smear fluorescent antibody (DFA) cytology method of detecting chlamydial infection was evaluated in an area where trachoma is endemic. Four hundred seventy-five children aged 2 to 10 years were examined, and adequate conjunctival cytology specimens were collected from 457 (96%). Trachomatous inflammatory changes were observed in 114 (25%) of the children. The DFA cytologic technique has a high specificity (100%) but a low sensitivity (8%). It offers a number of advantages over existing laboratory methods for diagnosing trachoma in the field. It is a rapid, simple, and easily transferred test that has a high specificity. Although DFA cytology shares the low sensitivity of other laboratory methods of diagnosing trachoma, we believe its logistical advantages make it the laboratory test of choice.



Author Affiliations

From the University of Louisville School of Medicine (Ms Wilson); the Sanitary Jurisdiction Number II, Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia, San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico (Dr Millan-Velasco); and the Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (Drs Tielsch and Taylor).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 29, 1985.

Reprint requests to The Wilmer Institute, Room 116, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Taylor).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis and Assessment of Trachoma
Solomon et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:982-1011.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.