You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 4, April 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations

J. T. Holladay, T. C. Prager, R. S. Ruiz, J. W. Lewis and H. Rosenthal

We reviewed the intraocular lens power calculations on 512 posterior chamber lens implantations and determined four ways to reduce the estimated 5% incidence of large postoperative refractive "surprises" (greater than 2 diopters [D]): First, preoperatively identify those patients who have greater than a 1-D difference between the theoretical and linear regression formulas. Second, repeat axial length and corneal power measurements in these patients to eliminate random error. Third, develop an individualized theoretical formula that accounts for constant bias. Fourth, encourage manufacturers to improve instrumentation for measuring corneal power and axial length. We also examined the disparity between the linear regression formula and the curvilinear theoretical formula.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predicting the refractive outcome after cataract surgery: the comparison of different IOLs and SRK-II v SRK-T
Elder
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:620-622.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.