You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Probing and irrigation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

R. M. Robb

I reviewed the results of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a series of 107 patients, with special reference to age at the time of probing. Relief of tearing and discharge was achieved in 90% of patients with the first probing, and an additional 6% were cured after a second probing. Altered nasolacrimal duct anatomy seemed to account for probing failures rather than any delay in probing. Primary probing continued to be an effective treatment well after 2 years of age and was successful in two 5-year-old patients. Unsuccessful probings were usually apparent at the time of the initial probing and were characterized by difficulty passing the probe and subsequent inability to irrigate saline through the nasolacrimal system into the nose. Dacryocystorhinostomy was an effective secondary procedure in the few patients in whom probing was unsuccessful.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Otolaryngological findings in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and implications for prognosis
Ugurbas et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2000;84:917-918.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.