You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 1, January 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Betaxolol vs timolol. A six-month double-blind comparison

R. H. Stewart, R. L. Kimbrough and R. L. Ward

Betaxolol hydrochloride (0.5%) and timolol maleate (0.5%) were compared in a six-month randomized, double-blind study involving 29 patients with glaucoma. The two drugs were comparable with regard to efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure. Betaxolol effected an average reduction of 7.6 mm Hg (26%); timolol, 8.4 mm Hg (29%). No patient required adjunctive medications during this study. Ocular side effects were mild and similar for both treatments. Neither drug affected corneal sensitivity, visual acuity, basal tear production, or pupil size. Since betaxolol has been shown to have little effect on the cardiopulmonary system, it should be strongly considered for the treatment of glaucoma.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Should {beta} blockers be abandoned as initial monotherapy in chronic open angle glaucoma? The controversy
Goldberg et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:691-695.
FULL TEXT  

A 7 year prospective comparative study of three topical {beta} blockers in the management of primary open angle glaucoma
Watson et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;85:962-968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Ophthalmic Formulation of a Beta-Adrenoceptor Antagonist, Levobetaxolol, Using Poly(Acrylic Acid) Nanoparticles as Carrier: Loading and Release Studies
De and Hoffman
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 2001;16:20-31.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.