You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (54)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Prognosis After Enucleation vs Cobalt 60 Irradiation of Melanomas

J. Donald M. Gass, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(7):916-923.


Abstract

• Between December 1962 and May 1979, growth of choroidal and ciliary body melanomas was documented in 34 patients prior to enucleation. Twenty-seven of the 34 patients underwent enucleation during the same time period (1967 through 1976), when primary treatment with a cobalt 60 episcleral plaque was employed in a nonrandomized fashion in 21 patients with similar-sized melanomas. Comparison of these two groups of patients, none of whom was unavailable for follow-up and all of whom were followed up for a minimum of 66 months, showed that the probability of dying of metastatic melanoma within five years after cobalt 60 therapy was 50% compared with 16% after enucleation. Factors of potential importance in explaining this difference included (1) nonrandomization, (2) small number of patients in both groups, and (3) greater frequency of anterior location of tumors in the cobalt 60 group (76% vs 22%). A randomized, controlled clinical trial is required to determine the relative safety of treatment for uveal melanomas.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 4, 1985.

Presented as the 45th George E. de Schweinitz Lecture at the Section on Ophthalmology meeting of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Nov 18, 1982.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Investigators' Perspective on the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study
Fine and Hawkins
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:968-971.
FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Metastatic Disease Status at Death in 435 Patients With Large Choroidal Melanoma in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS): COMS Report No. 15
The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:670-676.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Choice and Quality of Life in Patients With Choroidal Melanoma
Cruickshanks et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:461-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Review of Mortality From Choroidal Melanoma: II. A Meta-Analysis of 5-Year Mortality Rates Following Enucleation, 1966 Through 1988
Diener-West et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:245-250.
ABSTRACT  

Cox Regression Analysis in Clinical Research
Seigel
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:888-889.
ABSTRACT  

Enucleation vs Cobalt Plaque Radiotherapy for Malignant Melanomas of the Choroid and Ciliary Body
Augsburger et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:655-661.
ABSTRACT  

Enucleation vs Cobalt 60 Irradiation of Melanomas
Seddon et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:175-176.
ABSTRACT  

Ocular Melanoma
Gamel
Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1284-1284.
ABSTRACT  

How Should We Manage a Patient With Uveal Melanoma?
Fine
Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:910-911.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.