You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 4, April 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Factors associated with poor predictability by intraocular lens calculation formulas

S. C. Richards, R. J. Olson and W. L. Richards

In this study, we evaluated and compared two groups of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation cases. One group consisted of patients whose postoperative refraction was accurately predicted by IOL calculation formulas, while the other group included patients whose postoperative refraction was poorly predicted by the same formulas. We found that although postoperative astigmatism was greater in the poorly predicted group, preoperative to postoperative changes in astigmatism did not differ between the two groups. The poorly predicted group also had a shorter average axial length, a greater proportion of females, and an increased variability in most of the measurements we performed. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of measured postoperative anterior chamber depth, age at the time of the surgery, IOL power and style implanted, complication rate, or preoperative corneal integrity.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.