You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 3, March 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Levobunolol Compared With Timolol for the Long-term Control of Elevated Intraocular Pressure

Frank G. Berson, MD; Howard B. Cohen, MD; Robert J. Foerster, MD; Jonathan H. Lass, MD; Gary D. Novack, PhD; Efraim Duzman, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(3):379-382.


Abstract

• Levobunolol hydrochloride (0.5% and 1%) and timolol maleate (0.5%) are being compared in an ongoing, double-masked, randomized study of 141 patients with ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma. Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) in the three treatment groups ranged from 26 to 27 mm Hg. During the first 15 months of the study, the two drugs have not proved to be significantly different in ocular hypotensive efficacy, with overall mean IOP decreases of 6.8 to 7.6 mm Hg. In addition, the two concentrations of levobunolol have been equally effective in controlling IOP. Neither drug has been associated with any significant ocular side effects. Both drugs have produced significant decreases (five to ten beats per minute) in mean heart rate. The effect on mean blood pressure has been less pronounced: overall decreases have been less than 4 mm Hg for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The results of this ongoing study suggest that levobunolol is as effective and as safe as timolol for the long-term control of IOP.



Author Affiliations

From the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Glaucoma Service, Boston (Dr Berson); the Letterman Army Medical Center Ophthalmology Clinic, San Francisco (Dr Cohen); the Colorado Springs (Colo) Medical Center (Dr Foerster); the University Hospitals of Cleveland (Dr Lass); and the University of California-Irvine and the Clinical Research Department, Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Irvine (Drs Novack and Duzman).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 27, 1984.

Reprint requests to 2525 Dupont Dr, Irvine, CA 92715 (Dr Novack).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Randomized Clinical Trials on Medical Treatment of Glaucoma: Are They Appropriate to Guide Clinical Practice?
Rossetti et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:96-103.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of Timolol Maleate and Levobunolol: Doses and Volume per Bottle
Schwartz et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:17-18.
ABSTRACT  

Apraclonidine: A One-Week Dose-Response Study
Jampel et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1069-1073.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.