You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 1, January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosing Functional Visual Deficits With the P300 Component of the Visual Evoked Potential

Vernon L. Towle, PhD; Ernest Sutcliffe, MD; Samuel Sokol, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(1):47-50.


Abstract



• The visual evoked potential (VEP) is routinely used to assess visual function, though it occasionally does not reflect a patient's conscious experience. Reports of normal flash or pattern VEPs obtained from blind persons are extreme examples of this problem. The difficulty in interpreting VEPs in light of such findings can be partly overcome by obtaining a cognitive component of the evoked potential, P300. We obtained traditional visual acuity measurements, pattern-reversal VEPs, and VEPs containing P300s from three patients with clinically diagnosed functional visual deficits. The P300s were obtained in response to stimuli that the patients claimed they could not see, supporting the clinical conclusions that malingering or hysteria was involved. The P300 component can be helpful in assessing the subjective visual experience of patients suspected of having functional visual loss.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Neurology, University of Chicago (Dr Towle), and the Department of Ophthalmology, New England Medical Center, Boston (Drs Sutcliffe and Sokol).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Jan 13, 1984.

Read in part before the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, San Diego, May 3, 1984.

Reprint requests to the Department of Neurology, Box 425, University of Chicago, 5841 Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dr Towle).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Conversion disorder: a problematic diagnosis
Nicholson et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2011;82:1267-1273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.