This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Vernon L. Towle, PhD; Ernest Sutcliffe, MD; Samuel Sokol, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(1):47-50.

Abstract
• The visual evoked potential (VEP) is routinely used to assess visual function, though it occasionally does not reflect a patient's conscious experience. Reports of normal flash or pattern VEPs obtained from blind persons are extreme examples of this problem. The difficulty in interpreting VEPs in light of such findings can be partly overcome by obtaining a cognitive component of the evoked potential, P300. We obtained traditional visual acuity measurements, pattern-reversal VEPs, and VEPs containing P300s from three patients with clinically diagnosed functional visual deficits. The P300s were obtained in response to stimuli that the patients claimed they could not see, supporting the clinical conclusions that malingering or hysteria was involved. The P300 component can be helpful in assessing the subjective visual experience of patients suspected of having functional visual loss.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Neurology, University of Chicago (Dr Towle), and the Department of Ophthalmology, New England Medical Center, Boston (Drs Sutcliffe and Sokol).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 13, 1984.

Read in part before the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, San Diego, May 3, 1984.

Reprint requests to the Department of Neurology, Box 425, University of Chicago, 5841 Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dr Towle).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?