You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Intraocular pressure changes after neodymium-YAG laser posterior capsulotomy

M. M. Channell and H. Beckman

Thirty-seven Q-switched neodymium-YAG laser posterior capsulotomies were performed on 33 aphakic or pseudophakic eyes. The average intraocular pressure increase during the first 24 hours after treatment was 12.0 +/- 6.9 mm Hg from a baseline value of 17.7 mm Hg in the treated eye v +0.7 +/- 3.5 mm Hg in the untreated eye. Seven eyes had larger capsulotomies performed, averaging 250.7 millijoules (mJ) of energy per treatment. Thirty eyes had smaller posterior capsulotomies performed, averaging 48.3 mJ per treatment. Average IOP increases within the first day were 16.1 and 12 mm Hg, respectively. All eyes in which IOP increased more than 5 mm Hg showed the increase within the first 48 hours. In some eyes, IOP remained elevated more than 10 mm Hg above preoperative levels for several weeks. Higher pressures were associated with larger capsulotomies and increased energy. Minimizing debris and shock waves are recommended as well as thorough postoperative pressure monitoring.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intraocular pressure control after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy in eyes with glaucoma
Lin et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008;92:337-339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Effect of Nd:YAG Laser Posterior Capsulotomy on Intraocular Pressure
Ge et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1334-1337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.