You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 5, May 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma

J. Flammer, S. M. Drance and M. Zulauf

In the diagnosis and evaluation of progression of chronic open-angle glaucoma, a quantitative comparison of visual fields is important for which a knowledge of the spontaneous fluctuation of the visual field is essential. This study shows that in patients with glaucoma, the components of the short- and long-term fluctuation are substantially greater than in patients without the disease. Patients with suspected glaucoma show fluctuation in between, and all components of the fluctuation are greater in them than in normals and smaller than in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Total Deviation Probability Plots for Stimulus Size V Perimetry: A Comparison With Size III Stimuli
Wall et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:473-479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Intraocular Pressure Reduction on Perimetric Variability in Glaucomatous Eyes
Fogagnolo et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4557-4563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Methods to Predict Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma
Nouri-Mahdavi et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1176-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency of seeing characteristics of the short wavelength sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and diabetic patients with focal sensitivity loss
Gilmore et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1462-1467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unsupervised Machine Learning with Independent Component Analysis to Identify Areas of Progression in Glaucomatous Visual Fields
Sample et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3684-3692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Approach for Identifying Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Progression by Scanning Laser Tomography
Tan and Hitchings
IOVS 2003;44:2621-2626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods
Viswanathan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:726-730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma
Spry et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:107-112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression
Gardiner and Crabb
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:560-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spatial and Temporal Processing of Threshold Data for Detection of Progressive Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss
Spry et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:173-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Standard Automated Perimetry
Goldbaum et al.
IOVS 2002;43:162-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variability Components of Standard Automated Perimetry and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry
Spry et al.
IOVS 2001;42:1404-1410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Long-Term Fluctuation of the Visual Field in Stable Glaucoma
Hutchings et al.
IOVS 2000;41:3429-3436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confirmation of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Keltner et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1187-1194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simulation of Longitudinal Threshold Visual Field Data
Spry et al.
IOVS 2000;41:2192-2200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

False-Negative Responses in Glaucoma Perimetry: Indicators of Patient Performance or Test Reliability?
Bengtsson and Heijl
IOVS 2000;41:2201-2204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Instructions on Conventional Automated Perimetry
Kutzko et al.
IOVS 2000;41:2006-2013.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Response Variability in the Visual Field: Comparison of Optic Neuritis, Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, and Normal Eyes
Henson et al.
IOVS 2000;41:417-421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long- and Short-term Variability of Automated Perimetry Results in Patients With Optic Neuritis and Healthy Subjects
Wall et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:53-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2
Viswanathan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:1037-1042.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma
Westcott et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;81:452-459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.