You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 10, October 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  NEW INSTRUMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Miniature Compliance Monitor for Eyedrop Medication

Michael A. Kass, MD; David W. Meltzer, PhD, MD; Mae Gordon, PhD
From the Department of Ophthalmology (Drs Kass, Meltzer, and Gordon) and the Division of Biostatistics (Dr Gordon), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis. Dr Meltzer is now with the Dallas Eye Institute, Duncanville, Tex.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(10):1550-1554.


Abstract

• We developed an eyedrop medication monitor that electronically records the date and time of each medication administration over a six-week period. It records a medication usage in a 15-minute interval when the cap is removed from the bottle and the bottle is inverted. The electronic components housed inside the bottle weigh 7.5 g, including the batteries, and the total volume of the circuit is 7.5 cc. The monitor resembles commercially available 30-mL eyedrop bottles in size, shape, and weight. The monitor is accurate when tested against known patterns of usage. The electronic eyedrop monitor should be useful in assessing compliance with eyedrop medications.



Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 29, 1984.

Reprint requests to the Department of Ophthalmology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 (Dr Kass).

This study was supported in part by research grant EY 03579 from the National Eye Institute.

The authors have no commercial interest in the device described.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Model for Quantifying Difficulty in Squeezing Eyedrops From Their Containers
Nesher et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1114-1117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accuracy and performance of a commercially available Dosing Aid
Cronin et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:497-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microprocessor controlled compliance monitor for eye drop medication
Hermann and Diestelhorst
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:830-832.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adherence to Medication
Osterberg and Blaschke
NEJM 2005;353:487-497.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Preferences for Eye Drop Characteristics: A Willingness-to-Pay Analysis
Jampel et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:540-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Compliance With Saliva Sampling Protocols: Electronic Monitoring Reveals Invalid Cortisol Daytime Profiles in Noncompliant Subjects
Kudielka et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2003;65:313-319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Compliance and Prognosis in Glaucoma
Kass
Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:504-504.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.