This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (71)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Thomas R. Hedges III, MD; Greer L. Gieger, MD; Daniel M. Albert, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(8):1251-1254.

Abstract
• The clinical course of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of temporal arteritis but with negative temporal artery biopsy specimens was evaluated. Ninety-one patients undergoing a biopsy formed the basis of this study. Of these, 63 patients had no evidence of arteritis on biopsy, and 28 patients had biopsy specimens showing granulomatous inflammation. False-negative findings from biopsy specimens occurred in 5% of patients who had the disease. Cancer was the final diagnosis in 21% of patients with negative biopsy specimens v 3% of patients with temporal arteritis. Various chronic systemic inflammatory diseases were found in 16% of patients with negative biopsy specimens, while none of the patients with temporal arteritis had additional systemic inflammatory diseases. Patients with proven arteritis were notably older and had higher ESRs than patients without the disease. However, no laboratory test or frequently observed symptom or sign noted on initial examination, considered alone or in combination with other findings, had diagnostic sensitivity or specificity as high as temporal artery biopsy.

Author Affiliations
From the Eye Pathology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr Hedges is now with the New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston. Dr Hedges was a Heed Ophthalmic Fellow during this investigation.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Aug 12, 1982.

Read in part before the American Ophthalmological Society, Hot Springs, Va, May 24, 1982.

Reprint requests to New England Medical Center, PO Box 381, 171 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Hedges).

Judy Barton, MS, helped with the statistical aspects.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Bayesian Analysis of the True Sensitivity of a Temporal Artery Biopsy
Niederkohr and Levin
IOVS 2007;48:675-680.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Histological parameters helpful in recognising steroid-treated temporal arteritis: an analysis of 35 cases
Font and Prabhakaran
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:204-209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Giant Cell Arteritis in China: A Prospective Investigation
Zhiping Hu et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2002;53:457-463.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of prior steroid treatment on temporal artery biopsy findings in giant cell arteritis
Ray-Chaudhuri et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:530-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical performance for specialties undertaking temportal artery biopsies: who should perform them?
Galloway et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:250-250.
FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Temporal Arteritis?
Smetana and Shmerling
JAMA 2002;287:92-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporal artery biopsy in the management of giant cell arteritis with neuro-ophthalmic complications
Riordan-Eva et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1248-1251.
FULL TEXT  

Questions and Answers
Wolff
Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1377-1377.
 

The Ultimate Diagnoses of Patients Undergoing Temporal Artery Biopsies
Roth et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:901-903.
ABSTRACT