You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 101 No. 4, April 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Removal of Scleral Buckling Elements

Causes and Complications

Peggy S. Lindsey, MD; L. Harrell Pierce, MD; Robert B. Welch, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(4):570-573.


Abstract

• Fifty-three patients underwent removal of their scleral buckling elements in our operating rooms during a 25-year period. Of these, 18 patients suffered a retinal redetachment and two went on to phthisis. "Life-table" (survival) analysis showed that the risk of redetachment was 23% within the first 30 days after buckling element removal and 33% within 90 days. The cumulative risk of redetachment during a four-year period gradually increased to 47%. Factors that had a statistically significant association with redetachment included the degree of vitreous traction at the time of the original retinal detachment and the extent of the original detachment. Age, race, sex, preoperative condition, type of buckling element, and cause of buckling element removal did not have a statistically significant association with redetachment.



Author Affiliations

From the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore. Dr Lindsey is a fellow of The Johns Hopkins Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 8, 1982.

Read in part before a meeting of the Wilmer Residents Association, Baltimore, May 2, 1980.

Reprint requests to the Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 171 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Lindsey).

Statistical analysis was performed with the help of Argye Hillis, PhD.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retinal Detachment: Imaging of Surgical Treatments and Complications
Lane et al.
RadioGraphics 2003;23:983-994.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Imaging of Hydrogel Episcleral Buckle Fragmentation as a Late Complication After Retinal Reattachment Surgery
Lane et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1199-1202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Complications of Silicone and Hydrogel Explants in Retinal Reattachment Surgery
Roldan-Pallares et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:197-201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical experiences of infectious scleral ulceration: a complication of pterygium operation
Lin et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:980-983.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retinal Detachment
Rossi and Ciurlo
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:662-662.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.