 |
 |

The Role of the Penetrating Wound in the Development of Sympathetic OphthalmiaExperimental Observations
Narsing A. Rao, MD;
Jeff Robin, MD;
Dan Hartmann, MD;
Jan A. Sweeney;
George E. Marak, Jr, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(1):102-104.
Abstract
Clinical observations have established that sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) develops after a penetrating wound but not subsequent to often more severe intraocular disturbances such as extensive photocoagulation. A feature of the penetrating wound that appears important in the pathogenesis of SO is the access it provides for intraocular antigens to reach regional lymph nodes. The intraocular compartment has no lymphatic drainage and appears to function like a number of alymphatic biologic sites. In an experimental model of SO, subconjunctival injection of retinal S antigen in one eye induced a bilateral sympathetic uveitis, whereas intraocular injection in one eye was ineffective in inducing sympathetic disease.
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Rao, Robin, and Marak) and Pathology (Drs Hartmann and Sweeney), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 7, 1982.
Reprint requests to 6320 Fort Hunt Rd, Alexandria, VA 22307 (Dr Marak).
This investigation was supported in part by GEM P.C. and by grants EY 00887 and EY 02155 from the National Eye Institute.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The risk of sympathetic ophthalmia following evisceration for penetrating eye injuries at Groote Schuur Hospital
du Toit et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:61-63.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cytokine Gene Polymorphism in Sympathetic Ophthalmia
Atan et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4245-4250.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sympathetic ophthalmia risk following vitrectomy: should we counsel patients?
KILMARTIN et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:448-449.
FULL TEXT
Prospective surveillance of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland
Kilmartin et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:259-263.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|