You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 5, May 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Refractive keratoplasty: microkeratome evaluation

P. S. Binder, P. H. Akers, J. K. Deg and E. Y. Zavala

We performed routine microkeratome and freehand lamellar keratectomies in 65 canine eyes and 24 human eye-bank eyes. The microkeratome technique produced more predictable resections compared with the freehand technique and at the same time produced a wound that would allow for better wound coaptation. Neither technique damaged the corneal endothelium. We conclude that one of the reasons for the success of the refractive keratoplasty procedures is the refined microkeratome technique.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Femtosecond Laser Creates a Stronger Flap than a Mechanical Microkeratome
Kim et al.
IOVS 2006;47:599-604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.