You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 5, May 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Effects of extracapsular implant techniques on endothelial density

K. J. Hoffer

A comparison of surgical techniques with phacoemulsification showed that changing from anterior to posterior chamber emulsification afforded a drop in endothelial cell loss from 24.6% to 12.5%. Implantation of a Shearing posterior chamber lens instead of a Binkhorst two-loop iridocapsular lens did not decrease the cell loss using anterior chamber emulsification. Cell loss was approximately 25% in both groups. The addition of sodium hyaluronate (Healon) to the procedure of posterior chamber emulsification and implantation of a Shearing lens did not raise or lower the cell loss noted when using air alone. However, with the technique described whereby most of the sodium hyaluronate is irrigated from the eye at the end of the procedure, there was no increase in intraocular pressure postoperatively and no untoward effects. Posterior chamber emulsification seems mandatory, and though sodium hyaluronate did not improve cell loss, its use as a precaution seems to be completely safe when correct procedures are followed.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.