You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 10, October 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Visual Evoked Potential and Pupillary Signs

A Comparison in Optic Nerve Disease

Terry A. Cox, MD; H. Stanley Thompson, MD; Sohan S. Hayreh, MD, PhD, FRCS; Joan E. Snyder

Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(10):1603-1607.


Abstract

• We measured the pupil cycle time, the relative afferent pupillary defect, and the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) in 41 patients with unilateral anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) and 24 patients with unilateral optic neuritis. We speculated that the relative afferent pupillary defect would match the VEP amplitude and that the pupil cycle time would correspond to the VEP latency. We found a correlation between the relative afferent pupillary defect and VEP amplitude in patients with AION, but not in patients with optic neuritis. We also found that the pupil cycle time and VEP latency were weakly correlated, but only in patients with optic neuritis. In these two groups of patients with unilateral optic neuropathy, the most sensitive objective indicator of disease was the relative afferent pupillary defect. The least sensitive indicator was the pupil cycle time.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr Cox is now with the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 31, 1981.

Read in part before the spring meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, Fla, April 28, 1981.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105 (Dr Cox).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies.
Danesh-Meyer et al.
IOVS 2006;47:1458-1463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Stellate Ganglion Block on Visual Evoked Potential and Blood Flow of the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Liu et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;100:1193-1196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Latency of the Pupil Light Reflex: Sample Rate, Stimulus Intensity, and Variation in Normal Subjects
Bergamin and Kardon
IOVS 2003;44:1546-1554.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Evoked Potentials to Multiple Temporal Frequencies: Use in the Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathy
Bobak et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:936-940.
ABSTRACT  

Differentiation Between Recently Resolved Optic Neuritis and Central Serous Retinopathy: Use of Tests of Visual Function
Han et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:394-396.
ABSTRACT  

Visual Function Abnormalities in Central Serous Retinopathy
Folk et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1299-1302.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.